AI Notes
From canSAS
Notes from canSAS 2024 AI/ML in SAS Topical Presentation/Discussion
- Talk
- AI is pervasive
- The most impactful AI applications will be outside he facility wall, these mostly demand good, reduced data
- Decision ready data
- bespoke GUI reduction is unnecessarily user-unfriendly, AND prevents future data-intensive work
- Accessible documented API
- Magic cable story
- We should more regularly support outside decision engines as the 'center of the universe' with the instrument as a subordinate worker
- AI is pervasive
- Discussion
- Andrew Jackson
- Accessible documented API is good, public internet is not going to happen. All instruments should be able to be ‘plugged into’
- Brian Pauw
- Has solution for rolling nexus/NxCansas into scicat
- Jan Ilavsky
- Instrument control from open internet is not going to happen; decision is in wrong hands
- Why not just use EPICS?
- A: We’ve done that.
- People hate tiled/bluesky
- Unknown person
- How do you make sure the AI doesn’t break your instrument or put the instrument in a bad state?
- A: This is a problem with the instrument. If the instrument can be put in that state, it’s the instruments problem
- How do you make sure the AI doesn’t break your instrument or put the instrument in a bad state?
- Unknown Person
- How to preserve privacy of data for use in ML/AI applications?
- A: Good important question, no easy answers
- How to preserve privacy of data for use in ML/AI applications?
- Adrian Rennie
- Comment about “center of the universe”. Should be broader. All instruments should be switchable between these two views
- How to get the users integrated into the decision making?
- A: Human-machine interfaces is important. Code and efforts exists (Tsuchinoko)
- Brian Pauw
- We should support and push for instruments that aren’t the center of the universe
- Tanny Chavez
- Uncertainty quantification?
- A: Yes, very important
- Uncertainty quantification?
- Andrew Jackson