AI Notes: Difference between revisions
From canSAS
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
* Talk | |||
** AI is pervasive | |||
*** The most impactful AI applications will be outside he facility wall, these mostly demand good, reduced data | |||
** Decision ready data | |||
*** bespoke GUI reduction is unnecessarily user-unfriendly, AND prevents future data-intensive work | |||
** Accessible documented API | |||
*** Magic cable story | |||
*** We should more regularly support outside decision engines as the 'center of the universe' with the instrument as a subordinate worker | |||
* Discussion | |||
** Andrew Jackson | |||
*** Accessible documented API is good, public internet is not going to happen. All instruments should be able to be ‘plugged into’ | |||
** Brian Pauw | |||
*** Has solution for rolling nexus/NxCansas into scicat | |||
** Jan Ilavsky | |||
*** Instrument control from open internet is not going to happen; decision is in wrong hands | |||
*** Why not just use EPICS? | |||
**** A: We’ve done that. | |||
*** People hate tiled/bluesky | |||
** Unknown person | |||
*** How do you make sure the AI doesn’t break your instrument or put the instrument in a bad state? | |||
**** A: This is a problem with the instrument. If the instrument can be put in that state, it’s the instruments problem | |||
** Unknown Person | |||
*** How to preserve privacy of data for use in ML/AI applications? | |||
**** A: Good important question, no easy answers | |||
** Adrian Renee | |||
*** Comment about “center of the universe”. Should be broader. All instruments should be switchable between these two views | |||
*** How to get the users integrated into the decision making? | |||
**** A: Human-machine interfaces is important. Code and efforts exists (Tsuchinoko) | |||
** Brian Pauw | |||
*** We should support and push for instruments that aren’t the center of the universe | |||
** Tanny Chavez | |||
*** Uncertainty quantification? | |||
**** A: Yes, very important |
Revision as of 17:05, 25 November 2024
Notes from canSAS 2024 AI/ML in SAS Topical Presentation/Discussion
- Talk
- AI is pervasive
- The most impactful AI applications will be outside he facility wall, these mostly demand good, reduced data
- Decision ready data
- bespoke GUI reduction is unnecessarily user-unfriendly, AND prevents future data-intensive work
- Accessible documented API
- Magic cable story
- We should more regularly support outside decision engines as the 'center of the universe' with the instrument as a subordinate worker
- AI is pervasive
- Discussion
- Andrew Jackson
- Accessible documented API is good, public internet is not going to happen. All instruments should be able to be ‘plugged into’
- Brian Pauw
- Has solution for rolling nexus/NxCansas into scicat
- Jan Ilavsky
- Instrument control from open internet is not going to happen; decision is in wrong hands
- Why not just use EPICS?
- A: We’ve done that.
- People hate tiled/bluesky
- Unknown person
- How do you make sure the AI doesn’t break your instrument or put the instrument in a bad state?
- A: This is a problem with the instrument. If the instrument can be put in that state, it’s the instruments problem
- How do you make sure the AI doesn’t break your instrument or put the instrument in a bad state?
- Unknown Person
- How to preserve privacy of data for use in ML/AI applications?
- A: Good important question, no easy answers
- How to preserve privacy of data for use in ML/AI applications?
- Adrian Renee
- Comment about “center of the universe”. Should be broader. All instruments should be switchable between these two views
- How to get the users integrated into the decision making?
- A: Human-machine interfaces is important. Code and efforts exists (Tsuchinoko)
- Brian Pauw
- We should support and push for instruments that aren’t the center of the universe
- Tanny Chavez
- Uncertainty quantification?
- A: Yes, very important
- Uncertainty quantification?
- Andrew Jackson